Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Daniels (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. lone keep argument does not substantiate how the sources indicate notability 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Daniels (actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable actress, does not meet any criterion of WP:ENTERTAINER. She's had some parts, but so have millions of actors; there's no substantial in-depth coverage that I can find. The Arkansas Times mention is certainly complimentary; perhaps it is just WP:TOOSOON. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clear notability is sourced.Makro (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makro, could you please clarify the nature of your connection to Daniels? You appear to know her well enough to have been able to take this photograph of her in 2014. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers I work in the entertainment industry.Makro (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Makro - Does this mean you are a Paid contributor? reddogsix (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. I work with performers. I am not involved in promotion. I have never been paid to create any article.Makro (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. reddogsix (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this article can be kept under GNG. Makro (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How does this article meet WP:GNG? reddogsix (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking if WP:GNG was right. I'm guessing it isn't so that answers my question.Makro (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. Actor has had minor parts, but nothing that supports WP:ENT. References are brief mentions or single line entries.WP:TOOSOON applies. reddogsix (talk) 11:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO. No real substantive coverage yet as far as I can see. /wiae /tlk 15:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.